s

Highly Detailed Scout Report - ID # 7

Player's Name:
Scott Pollock
Formation:
3-4-1-2
Age / D.O.B:
12-03-2001
Shirt Number:
14
Height:
180
Weight:
80
Postcode / Area:
NN4
Preferred Foot:
Right
Position In The Video:
CAM
Video Link:
Coach Instructions:
The coach stated to run into the channels.

*All timings listed refer to the video timestamp, not match clock.

Physical

Scout Rating:
7 / 10
Developmental Rating:
8 / 10
Comments

Times in brackets (MM:SS) are the video timings not the match timings.


Pollock looked a decent build, lean but solid, and his general mobility was good. At times, though, he did not use his body as well as he should, getting muscled off it on occasion (see teammate Hall #27 on 21:25 showing how to use body and weight distribution to challenge). In the air, he needs work, he often leapt with a token effort and at times smaller opponents won
the aerial duel (28:20 and 37:00). From a stamina perspective – he saw the game out well.

Tactical

Scout Rating:
6 / 10
Developmental Rating:
7 / 10
Comments

Pollock often dropped in, with two CFs (Newton #9 and Hall #27) ahead of him (who often split apart in the 3-4-1-2). At times, he had opportunity to fill that gap and break beyond the two CFs, but he did not do this. He did not really run the channels (as per instructions defined at the top of the report) and often made straight line runs forward – lacking the guile to vary his runs. He played the ACM role more as a midfielder than as a secondary striker – because, I expect, he had two CFs in front of him.  At set pieces, he either joined teammates on the edge of the box (from where he got his goal) or hung back outside the box. He did not get involved in aerial duels but was always looking for the ball to drop to him. Defensively, at times, he allowed players to run off him (93:41). He looked to match up against the DCM for Ramsgate (#10) keeping tabs on that player but was prone to make it too easy in the first-half for Ramsgate to bring the ball forward (20:37) or pass forward, lacking nous to block the passing lane (21:15) and with intensity lacking (31:40). This improved as the game wore on, though overall, his effort and intensity need to get better (as was the case on 28:15 where he did well – needs more of that approach). If he can improve his intensity, this will help his team, tactically, and raise with teammates / manager his profile for being a reliable defensively diligent contributor – someone they can trust. Without increased defensive intensity he runs the danger of being tagged a ‘luxury player’. As an ACM, at times, a game can pass a player by, and Pollock needs to figure out what he does in these situations / game phases – Go looking for it? Offer more in deeper positions in midfield? Offer more defensively? Make runs for others? He needs to think about what his strategy will be on those occasions. When dropping into an orthodox CM position (on the introduction of #10 and #20 for Brackley), he did not show any great passing range, but the (often) moderate tempo of his play on the ball suggests he would be comfortable in the role of deep-lying playmaker. 

Technical

Scout Rating:
9 / 10
Developmental Rating:
9 / 10
Comments

Technically, Pollock is standout for the level. He is capable with both feet and can pick a pass or deliver an effective cross into the box. His first touch is excellent (26:30, 38:14 and many other
occasions, 40:55 great feet), and he looks completely at home with the ball at his feet. First touch, general control, ball carrying, lay-offs (including for the Newton goal) all showcase his superb technical ability. He possesses finishing ability above the level too (see his goal) and can bring others into the game with good feet in the process of linking play.

 

Psychological & Sociological

Scout Rating:
6 / 10
Developmental Rating:
8 / 10
Comments

Early in the game (17:20) Pollock showed quick reactions to pounce on the ball and break forward well. But, on other occasions, this vigour was lacking in his play. At one point, he did not read the knock-down (on 20:20) when his teammate Hall did, and this showed a tendency for him to be a touch reactive in his play. As referenced in the tactical section, he could lack intensity and desire to close and needs to work on this aspect of his game. In attacking situations, his movement was inconsistent, occasionally lacking, though, other times he did well (33:28). He should not be afraid to show more often for the ball and demand to receive it from teammates (as he did not do, but should have done, on 41:22). Though, he did show well in another situation (35:50), by offering for the throw then heading on a super run – and more of that type of play is required. To vary his play, when not demanding it, he needs to learn to stand still and let space open up around him (watch Cantona – the master of this) or look to create opportunities with subtle movement (he did this well on the odd occasion to prove he has it in his locker: i.e. on 82:54). He needs to think about where the space is and then exploit it, rather than focus on the positions of players on the pitch. The best players gravitate to spaces –
he needs to learn better to do the same. Above: Here Pollock has the chance to find space and create an easy pass for his teammate or create space for the man on the ball by dragging opponents away.
 

Strengths

  • Technically very strong – above the level he is playing at.
  • Finishing – superb finish for his goal. Well above the level.
  • First touch, ball-carrying, link play – all strong attributes.
  • Offered cover when others broke forward in CM – wants to support his teammates.
  • Occupies defenders when he gets on the ball. Can make things happen

Areas of Improvement

  • Often lacked intensity closing and in his offensive actions (watch Brereton-Dias, a similar technical player, but with high-energy actions). 
  • When he did close – at times – he approached too fast and unbalanced (see 51:51, beaten too easily) or did not work with teammates (92:50) well enough to ensure an effective press.
  • I did not feel he ever ‘stamped his authority’ on the game, drifting through periods, not demanding to be found with the ball, despite a goal and an assist. I feel like there is a lot more in the locker. 
    He needs to learn to use his body to shield the ball or challenge opponents, more effectively, utilising his build – he should continue to work on his core strength and more effective body
    weight distribution in 1v1 challenges. 
  • He needs to work on dominating more in the air – be braver / smarter. Anticipate the ball flight better. Beat the smaller man! 
  • Pollock should be brave to stand still at times (as he did superbly for his goal) – creating space for himself but also for others. 
  • He must DEMAND the ball! Be the pivotal player in the ACM role. Rollock others if he does not get it. 
  • Vary forward runs (not just straight line runs). Scout referral section 
     

Scout Referral

Tagged Scouts
Additional Comments

Scott Pollock is a technically strong player at the level he is participating for Brackley. He is only 23-years-old and has scope for loads of further development physically, psychologically, and tactically but already shows some superb technical attributes – first touch, link play, composed finish. I would recommend he continues to work at his game while considering where he feels he fits best in terms of complementary playing style and team formation for his abilities.

Summary Evaluation

Category Scout Rating Development Rating
Physical 7 8
Tactical 6 7
Technical 9 9
Psychological 6 8
Overall Score 28 / 40 32 / 40
Influence on Game 9 N/A
Current level and potential to play at which step of football? National League EFL 1 / 2
Summary

Scott Pollock offers value to his team in the following areas: physical and tactical potential and technical ability (link play, control, finishing and passing).
He needs to improve his physicality – 1v1 strength, aerial presence and work-rate, across 90+ minutes, focusing on closing with more intensity, learning to ‘hunt’ with teammates and winning ground and loose ball duels (and when he cannot – ensuring he delays the play).


Technically he is well above the level he is at, which should highlight to Scott that it is the mental, tactical and physical sides that he currently lacks in, in order to make an impact higher up the pyramid. Tactically, he can be naïve but overall knows his role and has the scope to improve with game time. He needs to consider if the ACM or CM role is a better fit for him, at ACM he can show his ability in the final third, and perhaps he may shine better for playing in behind a single CF, employed more as a secondary striker, rather than behind two CFs, as was the case here.


Overall, there is enough across the four elements, physical, tactical, technical, and psychological to be optimistic that if Scott applies himself over the next 2-3 seasons, he will develop into a very good football player at the top end of the NL or at the EFL level of the game. He needs to retain confidence in his technical ability (which is EFL level already) and learn how to apply himself in other elements to bring forward his overall game.


His immediate development focus should be:
a) Keep building himself up physically – core strength to hold off challenges, and spring /
timing of leap to compete aerially.
b) Be cuter with his movement and look to spot the spaces on the pitch, not be guided by
watching players. Sometimes make runs for teammates, not just for himself.
c) Raise his energy and intensity in actions both on and off the ball.

Scout affiliated club / network
Derby
Scout name
Tony Kinnear
Scout Signature
T.Kinnear – 2025-08-15
Player Rating

Appendices for scouts to use completing the report

Player ratings
Ratings out of 10 (technical, tactical, sociological, and psychological)

10 out 10 = Professional Player Premiership / international standard.

9 out 10 = Professional Standard Championship / EFL 1

8 out 10 = Professional Standard EFL 2

7 out 10 = Professional National League Step1

6 out 10 = Semi Professional (Step 2)

5 out 10 = Semi Professional (Step 3)

4 out 10 = Semi Professional (Step 4)

3 out 10 = Step 5 standard

2 out 10 = Step 6 standard

1 out 10 = Step 7 standard

Ratings out of 40 (Overall Score)

40 out 40 = Professional Player Premiership / international standard.

36 out 40 = Professional Standard Championship / EFL 1

32 out 40 = Professional Standard EFL 2

28 out 40 = Professional National League Step1

24 out 40 = Semi Professional (Step 2)

20 out 40 = Semi Professional (Step 3)

16 out 40 = Semi Professional (Step 4)

12 out 40 = Step 5 standard

8 out 40 = Step 6 standard

4 out 40 = Step 7 standard

Ratings out of 10 (Player Influence on game)

10 out 10 = Very highly Influenced the game, goals, assists build up play

9 out 10

8 out 10 = Highly Influenced the game

7 out 10

6 out 10 = More likely influenced the game

5 out 10 = Moderately influenced the game

4 out 10 = Less likely influenced the game

3 out 10

2 out 10 = Lightly influenced the game

1 out 10

0 out 10 = Did not influenced the game, goals, assists or any build up play